<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>C# Hacker - The Rambling Coder &#187; SQLServer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/category/database/mssqlserver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog</link>
	<description>Thoughts and ponderings on the technical world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:15:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Handy SQL Server knowledge nuggets</title>
		<link>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2010/01/24/handy-sql-server-knowledge-nuggets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2010/01/24/handy-sql-server-knowledge-nuggets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQLServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/?p=499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are worth reading, kind of a read once &#8211; nothing too complicated. However they will be useful if you have the need for these [How to find out what procedure is doing a data modification] Very simple, yet effective approach to determine what RPC call is altering your data. This is a read it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are worth reading, kind of a read once &#8211; nothing too complicated. However they will be useful if you have the need for these</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/antxxxx/archive/2009/10/13/how-to-find-out-what-procedure-is-doing-an-insert.aspx">[How to find out what procedure is doing a data modification</a>]
<ul>
<li>Very simple, yet effective approach to determine what RPC call is altering your data. This is a read it once, you get the ah-ha why didn&#8217;t I think of that moment and you wont need to reference it again!</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>[<a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/jamie_thomson/archive/2009/11/25/temporary-procedures-sql-server.aspx">Temporary procedures : T-SQL</a>]
<ul>
<li>We all know about temporary tables, but you can do that for stored procedures as well. Neat if you have a need for it</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>[<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2009/11/12/conor-vs-foreign-key-join-elimination.aspx">Conor vs. FOREIGN KEY join elimination</a>]
<ul>
<li>Explains a bit of the history why a single column foreign key performs better than a multi-column FK. Its the old 80:20 rule at work, or probably more accurately 99.9:0.1 rule <img src='http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>[<a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/repieter/archive/2009/11/17/ssrs-report-execution-failed-solution-sspi-ntlm.aspx">SSRS -Report execution failed. Solution: SSPI=NTLM</a>]
<ul>
<li>Seems downgrading to NTLM solves some integrated security issues if Kerberos is not playing nicely. Handy to know.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>[<a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/tonyrogerson/archive/2009/11/24/taking-advantage-of-table-variables-not-being-transactional-application-logging-files-within-a-transaction-and-keeping-what-s-happened.aspx">Take advantage of Table Variables NOT being transactional</a>]
<ul>
<li>Ever needed to store state in a transaction that you didnt want to be rolled back? Think log tables! Read and learn <img src='http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>[<a href="http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/01/12/sql-server-fragmentation-detect-fragmentation-and-eliminate-fragmentation/">SQL SERVER – Fragmentation, Detection and how to resolve it</a>]
<ul>
<li>Nice overview of fragmentation, and shows how to use DMV&#8217;s rather than the old school SQL 2000 DBCC approaches <img src='http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>[<a href="http://sys2dmvs.codeplex.com/">CodePlex: SYS2 DMVs</a>]
<ul>
<li>Hopefully this will serve as a good collection point &#8211; its very &#8216;young&#8217; at the moment, but I would like it to live!</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>[<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlserverstorageengine/archive/2010/01/18/improvement-in-minimizing-lockhash-key-collisions-in-sql-server-2008r2-and-its-impact-on-concurrency.aspx">Locking improvements in SQL 2008 R2</a>]
<ul>
<li>Handy to know about, unfortunately R2 has a price hike associated with it <img src='http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>[<a href="http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/mladenp/archive/2010/01/21/SQL-Server-ndash-Find-the-most-expensive-operations-in-Execution.aspx">Find the most expensive operations in Execution plans</a>]
<ul>
<li>Handy way to take the XML plan and process it in a way to get a tabular list of the most expensive queries back. Very nice.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>I suspect everyone who has dealt with scalar UDF functions in production environments are already VERY aware of the performance sucking capability they can have on your nice server. Here are some nice comments if you are not painfully aware:</p>
<ul>
<li>[<a href="http://www.simple-talk.com/community/blogs/tony_davis/archive/2009/11/13/76413.aspx">Do Scalar UDFs give SQL Server a Bad Name?</a>]</li>
<li>[<a href="http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/sqlandthelike/archive/2009/10/15/udf-overhead-a-simple-example.aspx">UDF Overhead – A simple example</a>]</li>
</ul>
<p>Gareth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2010/01/24/handy-sql-server-knowledge-nuggets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SQL News &#8211; and the fact we have to go to 64 bit and more $</title>
		<link>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/11/14/sql-news-and-the-fact-we-have-to-go-to-64-bit-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/11/14/sql-news-and-the-fact-we-have-to-go-to-64-bit-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQLServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/?p=471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone should know now that there has been a massive amount of Microsoft activity. This article will cover the recent SQL activity, including end of service dates, x64 requirements, and a fairly significant price hike. The tipping point is...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone should know now that there has been a massive amount of Microsoft activity. This article will cover the recent SQL activity, however the big one really is that the tipping point for 64 bit is in progress. This is a shame for me as I&#8217;m running 32bit OS, and I&#8217;m going to have to pave my machine &#8211; but that is the price developers are going to have to pay to play!</p>
<ul>
<li>[<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/R2-editions.aspx">What's New in SQL Server 2008 R2 Editions</a>]
<ul>
<li>Biggest first &#8211; Price increase! To say I&#8217;m disappointed is an understatement in this area. Specifically for developers  already have to support 2005 &amp; 2008. Now they have to deal with R2, and persuade their customers to move to R2 if they want certain features.</li>
<li>MDS &#8211; Master Data Services &#8211; more on this one later. Pretty cool</li>
<li>Parallel Data Warehouse release
<ul>
<li>The DATAllegro purchase is now seeing the light as a Microsoft product!</li>
<li>Support of very large datasets (100Tb-1Pb). This is definitely something I would like to play with, but at $57,496 per processor&#8230;</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Standard now has backup compression &#8211; but with the price tag&#8230;</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>[<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlrsteamblog/archive/2009/11/09/sql-server-2008-r2-november-ctp-what-s-new-in-reporting-services.aspx">SQL Server 2008 R2 November CTP – What’s New In Reporting Services?</a>]
<ul>
<li>Report Builder 3.0 is available! Woohoo!</li>
<li>Enhanced sharepoint integration</li>
<li>Aggregates of aggregates</li>
<li>New Data Visualization Report Items</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>[<a href="http://sqlcat.com/msdnmirror/archive/2009/10/20/using-filtered-statistics-with-partitioned-tables.aspx">Using Filtered Statistics with Partitioned Tables</a>]
<ul>
<li>Learn to appreciate filtered statistics!</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>[<a href="http://sqlblog.com/blogs/jamie_thomson/archive/2009/11/13/mds-is-x64-only.aspx">MDS (Master Data Services) is x64 Only</a>]
<ul>
<li>I totally get this, but this is the tipping point for me to repave my machines <img src='http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </li>
<li>With this requiring x64 and many new products requiring Windows 2008, Windows 7 or Vista it seems now is the time to move up.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>[<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2009/10/08/end-of-service-pack-support-for-sql-server-2005-sp2-and-sql-server-2008-rtm.aspx">MSSQL End of service dates for Service packs</a>]
<ul>
<li>Support for SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 2 (SP2)  will end on <strong>January 12, 2010</strong></li>
<li>Support for SQL Server 2008 RTM will end on <strong>April 13, 2010</strong></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>More to come!</p>
<p>Gareth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/11/14/sql-news-and-the-fact-we-have-to-go-to-64-bit-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the heck is redacting a database?</title>
		<link>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/10/21/what-the-heck-is-redacting-a-database/</link>
		<comments>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/10/21/what-the-heck-is-redacting-a-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQLServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good friend of mine sent me the following link: [http://www.codersrevolution.com/index.cfm/2009/10/21/Sequoia-Voting-System-Witch-Hunt-err-Study-Project"] The learning we can take away from this is if you don&#8217;t adequately cleanse then you can expect the data to become available! While its an interesting concept they apparently tried (and not too successfully) to do. The best way to clean a database [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good friend of mine sent me the following link:</p>
<p>[<a href="http://www.codersrevolution.com/index.cfm/2009/10/21/Sequoia-Voting-System-Witch-Hunt-err-Study-Project">http://www.codersrevolution.com/index.cfm/2009/10/21/Sequoia-Voting-System-Witch-Hunt-err-Study-Project"</a>]</p>
<p>The learning we can take away from this is if you don&#8217;t adequately cleanse then you can expect the data to become available! While its an interesting concept they apparently tried (and not too successfully) to do. The best way to clean a database is to create a new one and just copy in the data you want exposed. Don&#8217;t trust the handy dandy DROP/DELTE <img src='http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If they wanted to expose/publish the 88 tables, then they should have created a new DB, copied in the tables and released it. Anything less than that you have to be VERY careful! And for the more security conscious it would be created on a recently wiped drive on a recently rebooted computer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/10/21/what-the-heck-is-redacting-a-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SQL Azure Invitation has arrived!</title>
		<link>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/08/24/sql-azure-is-available-to-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/08/24/sql-azure-is-available-to-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[High Availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQLServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I&#8217;m finally on the Azure CTP servers! If anyone has been hiding in a cave Azure is the Microsoft play at getting Microsoft SQL Server into the cloud. After creating an account you can create and drop databases in the &#8216;cloud&#8217;. Definitely pretty cool stuff. Now to see how well it performs and verify [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m finally on the Azure CTP servers! If anyone has been hiding in a cave Azure is the Microsoft play at getting Microsoft SQL Server into the cloud. After creating an account you can create and drop databases in the &#8216;cloud&#8217;.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-424" title="Azure Database Management Screen" src="http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/AzureDatabase.jpg" alt="Azure Database Management Screen" width="468" height="349" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Definitely pretty cool stuff. Now to see how well it performs and verify it supports all the nice SQ L stuff  (sparse columns, PIVOT, stored procedures etc).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">This will certainly be hyped by Microsoft over the coming weeks, and we will be trying it out! Much more to come on this topic,</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;">Gareth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/08/24/sql-azure-is-available-to-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SQL 2008 Cumulative Updates Released</title>
		<link>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/07/21/sql-2008-cumulative-updates-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/07/21/sql-2008-cumulative-updates-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 02:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQLServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/?p=403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two new CU updates have been released for SQL 2008 Cumulative Update #3 for SQL Server 2008 SP1 (Build 10.00.2723) Cumulative Update #6 for SQL Server 2008 RTM Things that stand out are: [970399]  FIX: The MAXDOP option for a running query or the max degree of parallelism option for the sp_configure stored procedure does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two new CU updates have been released for SQL 2008</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2009/07/20/cumulative-update-3-for-sql-server-2008-sp1.aspx">Cumulative Update #3 for SQL Server 2008 SP1</a> (Build 10.00.2723)</li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2009/07/20/cumulative-update-6-for-sql-server-2008-rtm.aspx">Cumulative Update #6 for SQL Server 2008 RTM</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Things that stand out are:</p>
<ul>
<li>[<a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970399/">970399</a>]  FIX: The MAXDOP option for a running query or the max degree of parallelism option for the sp_configure stored procedure does not work in SQL Server 2008</li>
<li><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/969844/">[969844]</a> FIX: You receive inconsistent results when you run index-related DMVs to return statistical information about missing indexes in SQL Server 2005 or in SQL Server 2008</li>
<li><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/969997/">[969997</a>]  FIX: You receive an incorrect result when you query data from a linked server that is created by using an index OLE DB provider in SQL Server 2005 or in SQL Server 2008</li>
<li><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970507/">[970507</a>]  FIX: Error message in SQL Server 2008 when you run an INSERT SELECT statement on a table: &#8220;Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint &#8216;&lt;PrimaryKey&gt;&#8217;. Cannot insert duplicate key in object &#8216;&lt;TableName&gt;&#8217;&#8221;</li>
<li><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971064/">[971064</a>]  FIX: Quotation marks are rendered incorrectly when you export a SQL Server 2008 Reporting Services report to a .csv file</li>
</ul>
<p>Obviously you need to really read to understand if you have seen any of the problems the fixes address to be fully aware &#8211; and definitely don&#8217;t apply unless you need a fix!</p>
<p>Gareth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/07/21/sql-2008-cumulative-updates-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft SQL Services is now Microsoft SQL Azure</title>
		<link>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/07/08/microsoft-sql-services-is-now-microsoft-sql-azure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/07/08/microsoft-sql-services-is-now-microsoft-sql-azure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Warehousing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQLServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft SQL Services is now Microsoft SQL Azure &#8211; let the rebranding process begin After not initially supporting TDS the name is now changing to the Azure brand. Microsoft is updating the branding for SQL Services and SQL Data Services. Effective immediately, SQL Services will be called Microsoft SQL Azure, and SQL Data Services will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.technet.com/dataplatforminsider/archive/2009/07/08/microsoft-sql-services-is-now-microsoft-sql-azure.aspx">Microsoft SQL Services is now Microsoft SQL Azure</a> &#8211; let the rebranding process begin <img src='http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  After not initially supporting TDS the name is now changing to the Azure brand.</p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft is updating the branding for SQL Services and SQL Data Services. Effective immediately, SQL Services will be called Microsoft SQL Azure, and SQL Data Services will be Microsoft SQL Azure Database.</p>
<p>There will be more news and updates related to our Software + Services strategy next week at Microsoft’s Worldwide Partner Conference in New Orleans. For those of you not attending in person, all the news and information can be found at:  <a href="http://www.digitalwpc.com/">http://www.digitalwpc.com/</a> .  Check back often starting next Monday, July 13, for daily updates.</p></blockquote>
<p>More about TSQL Support in SQL Data Services can be found <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ssds/archive/2009/07/07/9823115.aspx">here</a>. Another announcement of this can be found at &#8220;<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ssds/archive/2009/07/09/9827971.aspx">SQL Azure &#8211; Same great platform, just a better aligned name</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Apparently its a &#8216;Cloudy&#8217; week <img src='http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Gareth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/07/08/microsoft-sql-services-is-now-microsoft-sql-azure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to install SQL2008 on Windows 2008 RC2 (or Windows 7)?</title>
		<link>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/06/25/want-to-install-sql2008-on-windows-2008-rc2-or-windows-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/06/25/want-to-install-sql2008-on-windows-2008-rc2-or-windows-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Warehousing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQLServer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/?p=230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately its not as simple as you would think, SQL Server 2008 install requires the .NET 3.5 framework to be installed or will install it as part of the pre-req checking.   Changes in Windows 7 can prevent SQL Server 2008 from installing the .NET 3.5 framework pre-requisite.   Instead you may need to install the framework [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately its not as simple as you would think, SQL Server 2008 install requires the .NET 3.5 framework to be installed or will install it as part of the pre-req checking.   Changes in Windows 7 can prevent SQL Server 2008 from installing the .NET 3.5 framework pre-requisite.   Instead you may need to install the framework separately using the &#8220;Run this program in compatibility mode&#8221;.  Read <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/psssql/archive/2009/06/24/installing-net-3-5-framework-for-sql-server-2008-on-a-windows-7-windows-2008-rc2-builds.aspx">here</a> for more information.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE 2009-06-29:</strong> It seems there are similar issues with SQL2005 as well, have a look <a href="http://sqlserver-qa.net/blogs/tools/archive/2009/06/29/sql-server-version-has-a-known-compatibility-issues-with-windows-7-rc-this-warning-is-genuine-and-applies-to-all-sql-server-editions-including-all-express-editions.aspx">SQL Server version has a known compatibility issues with Windows 7 RC. This warning is genuine and applies to all SQL Server editions, including all Express editions</a>.</p>
<p>Gareth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/06/25/want-to-install-sql2008-on-windows-2008-rc2-or-windows-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cumulative Update #4 for SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 3 Released</title>
		<link>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/06/16/cumulative-update-4-for-sql-server-2005-service-pack-3-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/06/16/cumulative-update-4-for-sql-server-2005-service-pack-3-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SQLServer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft SQL Server Release Services have announced SQL 2005 CU#4 for Service Pack 3 is available here. The full list of problems resolved in this CU can be found http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970279/en-us Also for those running of SQL 2005 SP2 CU#14 has been released here Gareth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft SQL Server Release Services have announced SQL 2005 CU#4 for Service Pack 3 is available <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2009/06/15/cumulative-update-4-for-sql-server-2005-service-pack-3.aspx">here</a>.</p>
<p>The full list of problems resolved in this CU can be found <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970279/en-us">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/970279/en-us</a></p>
<p>Also for those running of SQL 2005 SP2 CU#14 has been released <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlreleaseservices/archive/2009/06/15/cumulative-update-14-for-sql-server-2005-service-pack-2.aspx">here </a></p>
<p>Gareth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.csharphacker.com/technicalblog/index.php/2009/06/16/cumulative-update-4-for-sql-server-2005-service-pack-3-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
